fbpx
1-888-310-4540 (main) / 1-888-707-6150 (support) info@spkaa.com
Select Page

Is The IT Department Really “Dead?”

windchill features best plm software
Written by Chris McHale
Published on January 15, 2022

It’s Time to Get Rid of the IT Department.”  That was the title of an opinion piece recently published in the Wall Street Journal.  Provocative?  Sure.  My answer to this is not “yes,” but many of the author’s points are valid. 

The Same Old IT Department?

No, the IT department isn’t “dead,” and no, it’s not time to get rid of the IT department.  But the IT service that the modern company needs has fundamentally changed.  A centralized, technology-siloed and focused department is definitely not the answer.  I started making this point some years agoIT service delivery in companies needs to evolve.

After looking at some of the comments to the WSJ article, I realized that this is still a divisive subject.  This is true, even after years of information technology oozing its way into every department of a company.  And I’m not sure why.

The Rise of Engineering Ops, DevOps, Marketing Ops and More

The author of the article wrote:

“…the idea of corralling all staff with knowledge and expertise deemed necessary to manage IT into one organizational unit no longer makes sense. Leaving IT decisions and activities to a department that is figuratively and sometimes physically far from the so-called core business is a recipe for disaster.”

This is true.  For example, an IT team supporting a department or business unit absolutely needs to have specific understanding and skills in that department’s business, outside of technology.   The rise of  Marketing Ops, Sales Ops, DevOps, and Engineering Ops are proof of this.  They are teams that include technologists – but technologists that deeply understand the business of their unit, whether Marketing, Sales, Software Engineering, or Engineering.   They have spent time and effort to become great in an area of technology, but they also deeply understand the processes, goals, and nuances of their business department. 

The Need for Application Specialists

Further, these same department-focused IT engineers must be specialists in the applications and data that make their department function.  Applications (and data) are tied closely to a department’s daily work.  These apps support and guide the processes used by teams, and gather valuable data along the way.

The IT team must be able to configure and support these apps, upgrade them, understand best practices, and tailor them to the needs of a team.  Each department in a company has a number of these applications.  It’s impossible for a centralized IT department to specialize in all the apps that every department needs.  Furthermore, to properly manage these apps, the IT engineer must understand the processes and business of the department.  And that only comes from working inside the department.

And Then There’s The Data

These same arguments are true for the data.  Everyone talks about how important data is.  Yet each department has an immeasurable amount of data sitting with these applications, frequently untouched.   The department needs data engineering skills in order to present the data in a format useful to those responsible for analytics.  Only then can you create visualizations and reporting that help managers make good decisions.  If the technical skills AND the business skills live in the same person, s/he can develop analytics and insights much, much more easily.  

So over time, assisted by SaaS and the cloud, departments in many companies took on their own IT for these applications and data.  Gradually, the teams gained the names I’ve mentioned – Sales Ops, Marketing Ops, DevOps, Engineering Ops.

How About Organizing IT Differently?

Sure, one could organize a centralized IT department into groups that support each department.  Some large enterprises who have the staff have tried this.  But the success of this organizational effort depends on KPIs and who the IT engineers feel they are really “working for.”  Are they working for centralized IT and their KPIs, with a nod to the business?  Or are they reporting to the department leader and owning those goals foremost?

So Do We Still Need An IT Department?

All said, does this mean there’s no need for the classic, traditional IT department, as the author of the WSJ article stated?  Advocating the dissolution of the IT department misses a lot of very important points.   

The various “IT Ops” departments need overarching, governing technology policies and some standardization. Lacking this, a company’s technology will become chaotic and inefficient.  They need someone focused on cybersecurity policies and practices.  Someone needs to be the main support group for apps shared across the enterprise.  Further, infrastructure is typically shared, and someone needs to manage and support that infrastructure, or guide how others are supporting it.

So, the answer isn’t simple, or black and white.  The effective IT department must evolve, and it doesn’t look siloed, centralized, or rigid.  It looks flexible, responsive, business-centric, business-focused.  It is an integral part of each department.

Latest White Papers

2023 Global DevSecOps Report

2023 Global DevSecOps Report

Productivity and efficiency are top priorities for many organizations, as seen from the 2023 Global DevSecOps Report. It is no coincidence these two priorities are also the driving forces of DevOps. Explore how businesses utilized DevOps practices to achieve success...

Related Resources

A Beginner’s Guide for Metabase

A Beginner’s Guide for Metabase

There are many Business Intelligence (BI) tools on the market, seemingly with similar capabilities. The goal of BI tools is to collect, analyze, and visualize large amounts of data, transforming raw data into actionable insights. A popular open-source BI tool is...

Exploring the Powerful Features of Creo AAX for Complex Assemblies

Exploring the Powerful Features of Creo AAX for Complex Assemblies

Manufacturing can be an intricate and time-consuming process. It is important to utilize the proper software for successful execution, especially when working with complex assemblies. Complex assemblies typically have a high part count of diverse components and...

Using SPK vCAD to Address the Top Time-Wasters in Your Old System

Using SPK vCAD to Address the Top Time-Wasters in Your Old System

Computer Aided Design has replaced manual design drafting, but with the rise of vCAD will traditional CAD systems also be replaced?  Traditional CAD systems work well for designing accurate design representations, but they require extremely powerful (and expensive)...